Editorial Standards

Topic and product selection

Editorial coverage begins with a clear reader problem, goal, comparison, or product-decision need. A product is not included solely because an affiliate relationship is available or a commission may be higher.

Product research should explain who an option may fit, the practical reason it is being considered, important limitations, safety concerns, and what information remains unverified.

Evidence and claims

Health claims are limited to what the available evidence can reasonably support. Mechanistic, animal, observational, and clinical evidence are not treated as interchangeable, and product-specific evidence is not inferred from an ingredient alone.

When evidence is limited, mixed, indirect, or unavailable, the content should say so rather than convert uncertainty into a promise.

Safety and exclusions

Content must identify meaningful contraindications, interaction risks, vulnerable groups, and symptoms that warrant professional or urgent care when those issues are relevant.

Vitasor does not recommend prescription drugs, advise readers to stop prescribed treatment, or present tools as a diagnosis.

Affiliate relationships

Some links may generate a commission at no extra cost to the reader. Compensation does not justify hiding limitations, changing evidence standards, or omitting a safer non-commercial option.

Affiliate disclosures should appear close to relevant recommendations and outbound calls to action, with a site-level explanation available in the Affiliate Disclosure.

Updates and corrections

Content should be updated when material evidence, safety information, product availability, or commercial details change. Visible update and reviewer information must reflect the work actually completed.

Corrections should prioritize reader safety and clarity. Unsupported claims should be removed or qualified rather than preserved for promotional value.